Comment on Paper by Cohen, Patel, Thara, and Gureje
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comment on paper by Cohen, Patel, Thara, and Gureje.
I agree with the authors’ criticism of the use of the dichotomy between developed and developing countries, partly because of the difficulty in defining these terms and partly due to the myriad different social, cultural, and economic factors subsumed by them. While ‘‘low income’’ and ‘‘middle income’’ can be reasonably accurately defined, they also encompass a great diversity of factors, both ...
متن کاملComment on Paper by Reinelt and Ljung
This paper is an interesting and novel contribution to the important area of marrying robust control design to model formats provided by available system identification methods. This latter problem has generated significant research interest over the last decade, and is still of high interest as this paper, and other recent contributions such as [1, 2] and their extensive bibliographies attest....
متن کاملComment on a Paper
Before decoupling in the early universe, the tightly coupled photon/electron gas underwent acoustic oscillations. These oscillations should be visible today in the spectrum of anisotropies. Recently Fang, Huang, and Wu (1996) claimed that when random processes are accounted for, the phases of these oscillations are no longer coherent. In fact, they claim that the well-defined peaks will be comp...
متن کاملComment on Unruh's Paper *
William Unruh has commented on my recent proof of the incompatibility of certain predictions of quantum theory with the idea that no influence of any kind can act backward in time in any Lorentz frame. He argues that my proof contains, contrary to my explicit claim, a tacit reality assumption that conflicts with the ideas quantum theory. I show here that Unruh’s argument fails to draw a necessa...
متن کاملTop-down attention and consciousness: comment on Cohen et al.
Cohen and colleagues masterfully summarize the psychophysical and neurophysiological evidence pertaining to the distinction between visual attention and visual consciousness, concluding that attention is necessary but not sufficient for consciousness [1]. We disagree with their view for the following reasons. In our own work, we have been cautious to claim only that one can become conscious of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Schizophrenia Bulletin
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0586-7614,1745-1701
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbm142